zurück zu Linde Digital
TEL.: +43 1 246 30-801  |  E-MAIL: support@lindeverlag.at
Suchen Hilfe

Besitzen Sie diesen Inhalt bereits, melden Sie sich an.
oder schalten Sie Ihr Produkt zur digitalen Nutzung frei.

Dokumentvorschau
SWI 12, Dezember 2017, Seite 660

Transfer Pricing in internationalen Unternehmen post BEPS – ein Vergleich von Art 9 OECD-MA mit Art 7 OECD-MA (AOA) am Beispiel der Vertreterbetriebsstätte bei Tochtergesellschaften

Transfer Pricing in Multinational Enterprises Post-BEPS – A Comparison of Art 9 OECD MC with Art 7 OECD MC (AOA) on the Example of a Subsidiary Being Qualified as an Agency Permanent Establishment

Alfred Storck und Raphael Holzinger

The OECD Model Convention (OECD MC) has two separate articles dealing with transfer pricing issues, namely Art 9 for associated enterprises and Art 7 (since 2010: Art 7 OECD MC [AOA]) for permanent establishments (BEPS). While Art 7 AOA was redesigned in 2010, Art 9 OECD MC was only modified in the context of the BEPS project (Actions 8–10). In cases where a subsidiary of a MNE is qualified as an agency PE and the “dual taxation concept” is applied, both norms are applied in parallel: Art 9 OECD MC for the relation between principal and subsidiary (“DAE”) and Art 7 AOA for the relation between principal and agency PE (“DAPE”). This allows a comparison of the arm’s length principle embedded in both norms. The authors discuss the current post-BEPS debate on the profit attribution to agency PEs (OECD discussion drafts 2016 and 2017) and question the reasonability of the “dual taxation concept”. They conclude that Art 9 OECD MC needs to be applied first and should cover all activities of the dependent agent; taxation should then be based on the subsidiary, which includes the result of its own activities and those “on behalf of” the principal.

I. Geleitwort

Wir haben nunmehr seit vielen J...

Daten werden geladen...