Besitzen Sie diesen Inhalt bereits,
melden Sie sich an.
oder schalten Sie Ihr Produkt zur digitalen Nutzung frei.
Exploring Economic Justification in Transfer Pricing
Insights from RR Donnelley Czech and the Functional vs Formulaic Approaches in Czech Court
The case involved a transfer pricing dispute over RR Donnelley Czech’s procurement of hard disk drives for Banta Ireland. The tax authorities treated it as a financing arrangement, imposing additional tax and penalties. The Supreme Administrative Court ruled in favor of RR Donnelley Czech, citing insufficient justification for the reference price and flawed methodology. The decision reinforces the need for rigorous economic analysis in transfer pricing assessments.
1. Background and Facts of the Case
The case Czech Republic vs RR Donnelley Czech s.r.o. centered on a transfer pricing dispute concerning the interpretation and application of Section 23(7) of the Czech Income Tax Act. The key issue was whether RR Donnelley Czech had correctly adhered to the arm’s length principle in a transaction involving the procurement of hard disk drives (HDDs) on behalf of its related entity, Banta Ireland. The case highlights broader concerns regarding the methodologies used by tax authorities in evaluating intercompany transactions and determining appropriate pricing adjustments.
The Specialised Tax Office scrutinised the transaction and concluded that RR Donnelley Czech had not conducted it under ...