CJEU - Recent Developments in Direct Taxation 2024
1. Aufl. 2025
Besitzen Sie diesen Inhalt bereits,
melden Sie sich an.
oder schalten Sie Ihr Produkt zur digitalen Nutzung frei.
1. Introduction
In recent years, the CJEU has addressed a significant number of cases involving Belgian direct tax law. This contribution will review both recent judgements and ongoing cases. Section 2 discusses a Belgian case (Court of First Instance, Leuven) that builds upon the CJEU’s Danish Beneficial Ownership rulings. Section 3 revisits the Belgian Association of Tax Lawyers (BATL) case (C-623/22), which concerns the DAC6 reporting requirements. In Section 4, we provide a brief commentary on the Monmorieux case (C-380/23), which addresses procedural issues related to the required withdrawal of legal proceedings in one State when challenging taxation in another State. Section 5 examines the John Cockerill case (C-135/24), concerning Belgian corporate tax law and the Parent-Subsidiary Directive. Finally, in Section 6, we discuss the pending Chefquet case (C-119/24), which relates to surcharges imposed on non-residents.
S. 1142. Court of First Instance (Leuven), no. 21/942/A
2.1. Facts and legal background
In late 2017, a Belgian company (BelCo) paid interest on five loans provided by its Dutch subsidiary (NLCo2). BelCo sought an exemption from Belgian withholding tax under Article 11(3)(...